Not clash-and-fix. Every discipline — mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire — is routed jointly against the space before any clash check ever runs, so most conflicts are designed out rather than found and patched.
This work isn't quoted as a standalone line item — it's delivered as part of BuildPath Sprint, scoped and guaranteed at the engagement level.
Most MEP coordination models each discipline mostly on its own, then leans on a clash detection cycle to find and fix the collisions afterward — the model ends up clash-free, but the routing itself is whatever survived the fixes. We plan routing jointly, discipline by discipline, against the space itself before that cycle ever starts. The result isn't just fewer clashes — it's straighter runs, fewer fittings, less material, and a system your trades can install faster. OmegaBIM delivers this as a dedicated MEP crew, assembled per project — engineer, coordinator and manager — for MEP contractors and GCs across the US, UK, Australia and New Zealand.
We plan every discipline's routing jointly against the space first — straight runs, minimized offsets, coordinated sequencing across systems — so most clashes are designed out before a clash check ever runs. We manage the federated model as a single point of ownership throughout, and back the result with a delivered Optimization Summary benchmarking the routing against an unoptimized baseline.
Routing planned first, clash-checked second — the same discipline applied at every scale of engagement.
Every discipline routed together against the space itself — straight runs, minimized offsets, coordinated sequencing — before any clash check runs.
Structured Navisworks/Revizto clash rounds confirm the plan, catching what joint routing didn't already prevent.
Fitting count, run length and install sequence benchmarked against an unoptimized baseline — delivered as an artifact, not a claim.
Route-optimized federated model reaches zero hard clashes within scope and is signed off for shop drawing production.
Traditional coordination models each discipline mostly independently, then runs clash checks to find and fix conflicts after the fact. We plan routing jointly across disciplines first — clashes are designed out at the routing stage, so most never exist to begin with. Clash checking still runs, but as verification, not as the primary mechanism.
Yes — straighter runs and jointly planned sequencing mean fewer offsets and transitions, which means fewer fittings, less material, and a simpler system to install. This is measured, not assumed, and delivered as an Optimization Summary against a stated baseline.
Both, if needed — we can run the routing and clash cycle and meeting cadence, or slot into a coordination process your team already runs.
Typically weekly or biweekly, set at kickoff to match your project schedule.
On the BuildPath Sprint, yes — the federated model reaches zero hard clashes within agreed scope, with a delivered Optimization Summary before final payment. Earlier-stage coordination is run to the same rigor but without that formal guarantee, since the design itself is still evolving.
